58
9.
THIS COMPLAINT DOES NOT SEEK DUPLICATIVE REIMBURSEMENT
FROM THE RACKETEERING DEFENDANTS
9.1
There is a high probability that during the pendency of this civil action some of
the defendants in this action may enter pleas to the criminal conduct that involves the
RICO Enterprise of the Racketeering Lawyer/former Guardian and the Other
Racketeering Defendants
9.1.1
Obviously, the conduct that comprises the predicates acts for the RICO
Enterprise are criminal acts.
9.1.2
Some of the defendants in this civil action may wish to put their past
misconduct to rest and make amends to Gary Wayne Thompson for their thefts from
his assets.
9.1.3
In order that the defendants to this action can dispose of both their criminal
and civil liability at the same time, all assessments of fines, costs and restitution
against any of these defendants by the Superior Court of Coweta County, when paid,
will be a satisfaction of those particular defendants’ liability under this civil action.
9.1.4
In plainer language, if there are criminal indictments against the defendants
in this case and subsequent pleas of guilty, the Judge of the Superior Court of
Coweta, in accepting the recommendation of the District Attorney of the Coweta
Judicial Circuit, may assess fines, restitution and penalties. This disposition by the
Superior Court of Coweta County will be accepted by the present guardian of Gary
Wayne Thompson as a satisfaction of the obligations created by the causes of action
in this Complaint. All defendants entering into pleas of guilty to charges identified in
this civil action, upon payment of fines, costs and restitutions as the result of their
pleas of guilty, will be dismissed from this litigation, unless the Judge of the
